Chairman's Blog
How to obey the Church in the liturgy
 |
| Maybe... like this. |
My latest for OnePeterFive
When theologians want to discern the “teaching of the Church” they may be able to pick out some “extraordinary” act of the magisterium, such as an ex cathedra definition by the Pope, but very often there isn’t one available. This being so, they go to Scripture and Tradition, as containing the Deposit of Faith: they will tell us what the Church teaches. The Fathers and Doctors are witnesses to the Tradition and also draw out its implications. This is the “ordinary” magisterium of the Church, and the ordinary way in which the Church passes on the teaching which has been entrusted to her by our Lord.
This is how, ordinarily, God has chosen to reveal Himself to us; this is how, ordinarily, the Holy Spirit speaks to the Church: through what has been passed down. When people are moved to overturn established Tradition in favor of a radical new reading of Scripture, perhaps inspired by a private revelation, we can expect to hear some heresy.
This I hope is not controversial, but when it comes to the liturgy a very different attitude often takes hold. Liturgical progressives tell us that the Spirit has called them, or is calling the entire Church, to adopt some liturgical innovation: to take just one example, consider the service of the altar by females (altar girls). This overturns a tradition of only men and boys serving at Mass going back as far as the records go, which is the late 4th century (see canon 44 of the Collection of Laodicea).
Communion in the Hand for Catholic Answers
My latest for Catholic Answers.
A perennial source of debate, and occasionally of conflict, is the way we receive Holy Communion. In this article I would like to examine one of the sources often cited in this debate and place the issue into some historical context.
Letter in the Catholic Herald from Sir Edward Leigh MP
Sir Edward Leigh, the distinguished Catholic Member of Parliament, recently agreed to be one of the Latin Mass Society's Patrons. I was delighted to see this letter from him in the current Catholic Herald.
Catholic Herald, Letters, June 2023
Keep the old Mass alive
Sir — I was appalled to read in the Catholic Herald of
the way in which bishops are restricting the Traditional Latin Mass (April
2023). In a world beset by rampant indifference to religion, what possible harm
is caused by a few faithful attending a form of Mass which has been used for
centuries? I do not write on my own behalf; I am very content to attend the
new-rite Latin Mass at 10.30am in Westminster Cathedral every day. It is a good
compromise and the sung version on Saturday morning is wonderful. But for many,
particularly for young people, the old rite is a beautiful and calm spiritual
experience, so unlike the rest of our busy, crowded lives. Some people do not
find the stream of everyday English in the Mass a joyful experience. Many of
our ancestors — including, in my family, Blessed Richard Leigh, who went to
Tyburn in 1588 — suffered greatly, even to the point of martyrdom, to say and
attend the old Mass in England and thus keep the Faith alive. Surely we should
allow its use in their memory, if nothing else.
(Sir) Edward Leigh MP
London, UK
Ad orientem at the Last Supper; Hebrew from the Cross
 |
| Mass at Corpus Christi Maiden Lane |
The Tablet has published a letter from me in the ongoing discussion of the celebration of Mass 'ad orientem', facing the apse. It is remarkable how people have strong feeling about this (and many other things) and just assume that the Scriptures support them.
I could have added that the Mass, while it certainly memorialises both the Last Supper and Calvary, is also a continuation of the Temple and Synagogue traditions, and the heavenly liturgy described in the Apocolypse. Although certainly a liturgy, what happened at the Last Supper is not some kind of template for Mass, as if the question of 'facing the people' could be settled on that basis.
Sir,
Peter Simmons informs us that at the Last Supper and at Calvary Jesus ‘faced those who were present and spoke to them in their own language.’ It would seem Mr Simmons’s imagination is more powerful than the facts.
The awkwardness of seeing and conversing with Christ as he was reclining at the head of the table at the Last Supper, with the Apostles arranged in a row on the same side as depicted in ancient mosaics, is reflected in the need for St Peter to pass a message to Him via the Beloved Disciple (John 13:22ff). Moreover He would certainly have addressed them at a Passover meal in the liturgical language, Hebrew, and not the day-to-day language, Aramaic, just as Jews do to this day.
On the cross Jesus’ use of Hebrew actually caused confusion and misunderstanding: hearing the Hebrew ‘Eli’, ‘Lord’, bystanders thought He meant ‘Elijah’ (Matt 27:46ff). He didn’t care, because He was addressing not them, but His Heavenly Father. As Mr Simmons says, this is a lesson for us.
Yours faithfully,
Joseph Shaw
Chairman of the Latin Mass Society
Take children to Mass
My latest on Catholic Answers.
The presence and management of children at Mass is an issue that can generate more heat than light. I would like to tackle it here on the basis of a slightly deeper set of principles than is usual.
Full disclosure: I am a father of nine; my youngest has recently turned three. We have had to manage a child under five at Mass since our first was born in 2003; for most of the time, we’ve had two under five. That may sound extreme, but a couple who have three children at three-year intervals will have a child under five, and sometimes two of them, for fourteen years. This is a big chunk of your life.
The first question is whether bringing small children to Mass is good in principle. Children under the “age of reason” (usually about seven) are not bound by canon law to attend Mass. Often parents have no choice but to bring them in order to attend themselves. But supposing they had the choice—if they could attend different Masses, or leave the children with friends—is the ideal to bring them or leave them behind?
Letter to the Tablet, from 1965
 |
| The tenth station: Jesus is stripped. Fr the Church of SS Gregory & Augustine's, Oxford |
Defending the monarchy: with Timothy Flanders
What has the LMS achieved? 1972 edition
 |
| Quietly getting on with it. Mass at the Guild of St Clare spring sewing retreat. |
--------------------------
After reading so many quotations from the Press and so
little, in comparison, about the activities of the L.M.S. it may be asked “but
what actually was the L.M.S. doing all this time? What had it achieved? The
answer is that we did, in our News Letters give our members as much information
regarding the liturgical changes etc. as we could; that we did organize the
saying of Latin Masses both in London and in the country so far as we were
able, that our various Diocesan representatives were in touch with their
bishops trying to persuade them that Latin Masses were wanted, organizing
meetings and Masses where possible. But, in my opinion, our greatest activity
was the mere fact of our existence. An organized body of some two thousand
Catholics, small as that number is, could not be completely ignored by the bishops
and was a constant witness to the existence of a body of people who wanted the
Latin Mass, something that the bishops were constantly denying. It seemed to me
essential to keep the Society in existence if only because of its witness as
representing these many people, the vast majority of whom were not even members
of the Society, who loved and wanted the Latin Mass.
-------------------------
Houghton-Brown goes on to talk about the great triumph of the English Indult in which the LMS had a key role, and as the years have gone by the Society has organised a vast number of Masses, pilgrimages, training events, talks, and so on. Nevertheless, what he says remains true. Even a Una Voce group which can do little of all this by its very existence is a rebuke to those who say that there is no demand for the Traditional Mass, and this is the argument our opponents love to fall back on. Like it or not, when Catholics encounter their ancient liturgy, many of them want it.
Prayers and a Mass of Thanksgiving for the Coronation
The LMS has organised a Mass in thanksgiving for the Coronation on Monday in Corpus Christi Maiden Lane (London with some splendid polyphony: 6:30pm.
V. Dómine salvum fac Regem nostrum Cárolum.
R. Et exáudi nos in die, qua invocavérimus te.
Oremus.
Quǽsumus, omnípotens Deus, ut fámulus tuus Cárolus, Rex noster, quæ tua miseratióne suscépit regni gubernácula, virtútum étiam ómnium percípiat increméntum; quibus decénter ornátus et vitiórum monstra devitáre, [in time of war: hostes superáre,] et ad te qui via, véritas, et vita es, cum regina consorte et prole régia gratiósus valeat perveníre. Per Christum Dóminum nostrum.
R: Amen.
V. O Lord, save Charles our King
All: and hear us in the day that we shall call upon thee.
Let us pray.
We beseech thee, almighty God, that thy servant Charles our King, who through thy mercy has undertaken the government of this realm, may also receive an increase of all virtues. Fittingly adorned with these, may he be able to shun all evildoing, [in time of war: to vanquish his enemies,] and, together with the Queen consort and the royal family, to come by thy grace unto thee who art the way, the truth, and the life. Through Christ our Lord.
R: Amen.
.png)
On pomp and ceremoney, by Geoffrey Houghton-Brown
 |
| Bishop Campbell processing into the sanctuary of Westminster Cathedral to celebrate Mass for the LMS in 2019. Photo by John Aron. |
Houghton-Brown, an artist and convert, was a founding member of the LMS, at first a Vice President and later Chairman and Diocesan Representative for Westminster. His history of these eight years is quite comprehensive, and every now and then he makes an interesting observation.